NOTICE TO RACKETEERS
On Monday - another ex parte with Supervising Judge Rosenberg, calling upon him to vacate all of the Enterprise acts in Samaan v Zernik
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:25:33 -0700
To: "Moe Keshavarzi"
, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, "Pasternak" , "Amberg, John W." , "Van Cleve, Peter D." , "Paul Malingagio" PMalingagio@sheppardmullin.com,
From: joseph zernik firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: NOTICE OF EX PARTE APPEARANCE, AND NOTICE IN RE: KESHAVARZI'S NOTICE OF RULING JULY 17, 2008
"THE JUDGMENT WAS SET AND THE BOOKS WERE OPENED" Daniel 7:10
July 18, 2008
Att Amberg, Att. Keshavarzi, Att Pasternak, Att Shulkin:
This notice does not constitute any recognition of the LA Superior Court to engage as a Court in Samaan v Zernik SC087400. On the contrary, this notice is to alert parties to formal challenge to the authority of such court in this matter.
Judge Rosenberg was not present today in court. Therefore, the "ex parte" noticed for today will roll over to Monday.
I write to provide notice that at 8:30 a.m. on Monday, July 21, 2008, I will appear "Ex Parte" in the West District of the Los Angeles County Superior Court located at 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, California 90401, in department A. before Supervising Judge Rosenberg, in RE: Samaan v Zernik, SC087400.
This ex parte requests that the Supervising Judge vacate all acts of judges including, but not limited to, Connor, Segal, and Friedman, and neutrals, such as Pasternak, who operated under the color of the court, all of whom were and are part of the Enterprise in and by the LA Superior Court.
Therefore, Keshavarzi's notice of ruling, dated July 17, 2008, is invalid on its face. And the fact that Terry Friedman continues to pretend to be Presiding Judge with valid authority in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) as a legitimate court action, is simply an attempt to continue living in denial.
Similarly, attorneys who generate or actively participate in such activity cannot expect to benefit from any "litigation privileges". Events, such as the one staged by Keshavarzi on July 17, 2008, 8:30am, were not part of any legitimate court action.
The bottom line remains the same as always: The Los Angeles Superior Court continues to hide the books of court, and refuses to allow Defendant in pro per to inspect and to copy the books of court, where evidence should be found that would conclusively show that this is a legitimate court action. The Los Angeles County Superior Court takes such absurd position for a reason - since inspecting the books of court would incriminate the court and the judges, and some attorneys as well...
In short- the Court is taking the 5th. (the king is naked...)
Please let me know if you plan to attend and/or oppose.
Victim of the Enterprise
in and by"Judges" of LA Superior Court and others
While at court today, I again asked the Office of the Clerk to allow me to inspect and to copy litigation records of Samaan v Zernik (SC087400), to determine if and when the Aug 9, 2007 Judgment by Court Pursuant to CCP 437c was entered.The Clerk insisted that for security reasons I was not allowed to see the data myself, and instead went back for a while (to call Connor?), then came back with copy the paper fraudulently marked "Minutes Entered Aug 9, 2007 County Clerk". That paper was fraudulently entered into the system on Aug 14, 2008, but was never even validly entered as a Minute Order. Furthermore - it is fraudulent in its content. Obviously, that paper is neither proof of entry of judgment, nor a valid Minute Order, merely one more predicated act of the Enterprise.