Tuesday, November 24, 2009

09-11-24 David Pasternak's monetary transactions with Clerk John Clarke, as evidence of racketeering activity.

Superior Court of California - County of Los Angeles

- - - -

David Pasternak

Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:03:44 -0800
To: LIST FBI, LIST USDOJ

From: joseph zernik
Subject: Monetary transactions as evidence for conduct of a racketeering enterprise in the LA Justice System.

Bcc:

To FBI and Att Glenn Fine, Inspector General, U.S. Dept of Justice
Please accept the email notice below as additional evidence of an Enterprise of Racketeering in the LA Justice System.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated November 24, 2009

La Verne, County of Los Angeles, California Joseph H Zernik
By: __/s/Joseph H Zernik__
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
In Pro Se
____________________________
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:57:41 -0800
To: "David Pasternak" , "John A Clarke" <12136217952@efaxsend.com>, "Charles McCoy -Presiding Judge " <12136177176@efaxsend.com>
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Kindly request: Please no money laundering transactions as part of the operations of LA Superior Court

Att David Pasternak


John A Clarke - Clerk of the Court
<12136217952@efaxsend.com>

Charles McCoy -Presiding Judge
<12136177176@efaxsend.com>

RE: Kindly request: Please no money laundering transactions as part of the operations of LA Superior Court

I received via USPS on November 22, 2009, at my box in the La Verne Post Office a letter dated November 16, 2009, from Atty David Pasternak, post stamped November 16, 2009. [1] Such letter contained evidence of transaction of $6,000.00 in check written by David Pasternak to the Clerk of the Court, Check No 4323, 1st Century Bank, Los Angeles. Account details were written by hand, and the check appeared to be signed by Lisa Kalaydjian, who was previously listed as Suspect for colluding with Atty Pasternak in issuance of fraudulent grand deeds on property at 320 South Peck Drive, Beverly Hills, California, as indicated in California Crime Report CA01938800.

The November 9, 2007 Appointment Order purported by Atty David Pasternak as the foundation of his authority was fraud on its face. Its authentication was dated earlier than the Order itself - in what was dubbed the "Fingerprints of the LA-JR". [2] Similar false and deliberately misleading court orders were found in all four cases that were listed as key evidence for the complaint regarding the LA-JR [3] Neither the Clerk, nor the Presiding Judge of the Court were ever willing to certify such Order, regardless of numerous requests by me, or by legal services hired by me, which provided a declaration to that effect.

There is no registration of the "Receivership" of David Pasternak in any valid and effectual record of the LA Superior Court either, since the court claimed to keep no Book of Judgments, contrary to the requirement of California Codes.

All court fees in the purported case of "Samaan v Zernik (SC087400)" were listed as "Journal Entry", and the Presiding Judge and Clerk of the Court refused to answer questions regarding the ultimate designation of such funds. [4]

The evidence as a whole demonstrated that Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) was never a case of the Superior Court. The Clerk of the Court and Presiding Judge refused to state so either. However, the court denied access to a true Index of All Cases, and therefore the public was left susceptible to fraud as seen here.

The transaction evidenced in this letter was likely to be deemed upon review by competent court of jurisdiction as:
1) Mail fraud
2) Money Laundering.
3) Part of a pattern of racketeering activity by an enterprise operating in the LA Justice System.

I kindly request:
1) That Atty David Pasternak cease and desist conduct that was likely to be deemed racketeering.
2) That the LA Superior Court not collude in such conduct, and that the LA Superior Court not deposit this check.
3) In case the Court did deposit the check, that the account designation into which it was deposited be disclosed, and the coding of the transaction, and case number used relative to the origin of such funds.

This message is copied to various FBI field offices, and also to Atty Glenn Fine, Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Justice, as additional evidence for conduct of an organized crime enterprise in the LA Justice System.

Respectfully submitted,
Dated November 24, 2009
La Verne, County of Los Angeles, California Joseph H Zernik
By: __/s/Joseph H Zernik__
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
In Pro Se
Linked Records:
[1] November 16, 2009 Letter by David Pasternak, received in Post Office of La Verne, California.
http://inproperinla.com/09-11-16-pasternak-check-$6000-to-clerk-s.pdf
[2] Request for Corrective Actions in re: False Appointment Order of David Pasternak
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-00-00_09-10-16-request-mccoy-corrective-action-re-criminality-in-records-fine-judgment-pasternak-appointment-s.pdf
[3] Table summarizing four cases of the LA-JR
http://inproperinla.com/09-11-22-parallels-in-cases-of-the-la-jr-s.pdf
[4] Register of Actions, listing "Journal Entry" for all fees in purported case of Samaan v Zernik
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-register-of-actions-case-history-s-v-z-sustain-07-12-31_us-dist-ct-la_doc-39-08-04-17-req-for-judicial-notice-osc-contempt-s.pdf

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-24 Request to add correspondence with Police Chief Pickwith to complaint on LA-JR

Click to Return to Home Page
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:32:50 -0800
To: "Scott Pickwith"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: RE: October 2, 2009 DR#2009-3329 & Crime Report CA01938800. Kindly requesting your statement whether report I received today was a valid and effectual report of the La Verne Police. Timely response requested by November 24, 2009.
Bcc:

November 24, 2009

Dear Chief Pickwith:

Thank you very much for your response. Your note below still failed to answer the question in my email notice of November 17, 2009:
Was the record, which was provided to me by the La Verne Police Department, as Crime Report CA01938800, an honest, valid, and effectual Crime Report of the La Verne Police Department?
This email is copied to Inspector General, U.S. Department of Justice, and to FBI Field Office in Los Angeles. It is requested that it be added as evidence to complaint about conduct of an enterprise of organized crime in Southern California Justice System.

Sincerely,

Joseph Zernik

CC:
Councilmember Nasmyth, City of La Verne
Councilmember Johnson , City of La Verne
Martin Lomeli - City Manager, City of La Verne
Bob Russi - Assistant City Manager, City of La Verne
Ruth Mahlow - Record Supervisor, La verne Police Department
Various FBI Field Offices.
Atty Glenn A Fine, Inspector General, U.S. DOJ

At 11:26 AM 11/23/2009, you wrote:
Dear Mr. Zernik,

Although I disagree with your characterization of the report, I have to respond to you that the courtesy report is in fact a courtesy report. As you have been told, the signatures are typed rather than hand-affixed, however, they are nevertheless the signatures of myself and Detective Newman. The number of pages was not stated, because, in an endeavor to provide you with as much information as possible, materials which are not strictly part of the police report, such as your statement and the fraud expert report, were supplied to you.

Thank you for your courtesy.

Scott Pickwith
Chief of Police



From: joseph zernik [mailto:jz12345@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 4:55 PM
To: Scott Pickwith
Cc: Donna Nasmyth; Steve Johnson
Subject: October 2, 2009 DR#2009-3329 & Crime Report CA01938800. Kindly requesting your statement whether report I received today was a valid and effectual report of the La Verne Police. Timely response requested by November 24, 2009.

November 17, 2009

Scott Pickwith, Chief
LVPD

October 2, 2009 DR#2009-3329 & Crime Report CA01938800. Kindly requesting your statement whether report I received today was a valid and effectual report of the La Verne Police. Timely response requested by November 24, 2009.

Chief Pickwith:

Supervisor Mahlow told me by phone yesterday that the report was ready. Therefore I went to the station today. Ruth Mahlow, Record Supervisor presented me with a sealed envelope. I opened it in her presence. There were in it some 10-20 pages, all of them certified, with her signature, but none of them relevant as part of the Crime Report.

When I pointed out to Supervisor Mahlow that it was not the crime report, she took back the papers, and asked me to wait.

Since the wait became prolonged, I went over to city hall, and met briefly with Mr Lomli, city manager. A couple of weeks ago he promised me that the matter would be taken care of, and asked that I let him know if it was not. I asked if he could call and make sure that I get an honest, valid, and effectual report. He promised "Your concerns would be taken care of".

When I came back to the station, I was presented by the Duty Officer with a package of entirely different papers than I was presented earlier. This time they were indeed pages of a police report:

1) The first page, still included the false and misleading information, with no foundation at all.

2) The two supplemental pages, with your name typed, included correct information, but were missing your hand signature,

3) A supplemental page by Detective Newman was likewise unsigned.

4) The fraud expert report, was included in the loose pages,

5) My typed statement was included in the loose package.

6) The number of pages in the report was never stated.

I pointed the missing signatures to Duty officer- she tried hard to convince me that the certification as sufficient on a record that was unsigned. I pointed out the missing signatures also to the Captain, but the Captain indicated that the missing signatures would not be provided.

I am writing to kindly ask that you state whether a crime report, made of loose pages, where the number of pages was never stated, where he first page -- including false and misleading information -- was signed and dated, and where the other supplemental pages by police -- including correct information -- were unsigned, was indeed an honest, valid, and effectual crime report of the La Verne Police Department..

Sincerely,

Joseph Zernik

CC:
Councilmember Nasmyth
Councilmember Johnson
"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.