To: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Subject: US District Court, Florida - dubious Thompson's papers: Jack notifies court of corruptrion in his nemesis Greenberg Traurig
Date: May 14, 2010 11:46 AM
Dear Mr Thompson:
Sorry to say, it is likely that you are being duped. However, you are in good company - some accomplished and experienced attorneys - like Richard Fine were duped in the very same manner...
For any of your filings, even if conducted via snail mail, to be an honest, valid, and effectual filings, the clerk of the court, after scanning the record into the docket in PACER must issue by email an NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing) bearing a Court Stamp, which today is an RSA encrypted alphanumeric string, which is placed at the bottom of the NEF, and which appears to most naive readers a gibberish.
However, since you are not authorized in CM/ECF, you are denied the right of Notice and Service of such critical court records, which are meanwhile noticed and served on other parties in your case, who are authorized in CM/ECF. That is inherent to the alleged routine fraud against parties who are not authorized in CM/ECF at the US courts today.
Any court minutes, orders, judgments, mandates that may be served on you by the court by USPS mail, must be authenticated in the same manner, in order that such records require "full faith and credit." However, since you are not authorized in CM/ECF you may not receive the NEFs on court papers either.
In case you have in your possession any paper,
Most likely you are not even aware which of the papers in your possession are honest, valid, and effectual court records, and which ones are not. That is the essence of the alleged Shell Game Fraud in PACER and CM/ECF today
The way you conduct yourself at present, you are distributing court records, holding them out to be honest, valid, and effectual court records, while you may have no evidence to support such claims.
It took well over half a year. but when I finally gained access, it became clear that all court actions named above were merely a convoluted hoax - none of the records issued by the courts were adequately verified and/or authenticated. 
The same was documented in the case of Scott Huminski,  which - once discovered - led him to abandon any further filing with the US courts, and resort instead to recording music clips and posting them on U-tube...
In short: I suggest that at present you clearly mark records that you distribute as of ambiguous or dubious nature at best - until you gain access to the NEFs in your own case. Once you gain access, it would be appreciated if you shared the NEFs with the public at large, including, but not limited to this group - after all - they were public records to begin with.
Once you gain access to the NEFs, you may follow Scott Huminski's example, since you may conclude that U-tube is accessible, while you may conclude that you have been effectively denied access to the US courts through both extrinsic and intrinsic alleged fraud.
Los Angeles County, California
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lawsters" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to email@example.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lawsters?hl=en.