Wednesday, October 31, 2012

12-10-31 Hello World!

Wednesday, October 31 @ 19:52 : Trenton, New Jersey, US
Wednesday, October 31 @ 19:47 : Nieuwstadt, NL
Wednesday, October 31 @ 19:40 : Apex, North Carolina, US
Wednesday, October 31 @ 19:17 : Los Angeles, California, US
Wednesday, October 31 @ 19:01 : Jerusalem, IL
Wednesday, October 31 @ 18:59 : Paris, FR
Wednesday, October 31 @ 18:56 : Kowloon, HK
Wednesday, October 31 @ 18:50 : Roscoe, Illinois, US
Wednesday, October 31 @ 18:30 : San Jose, California, US
Wednesday, October 31 @ 17:37 : Yemen, YE

12-10-30 Citizens' Grand Jury Indicts Obama and Biden

Citizens' Grand Jury Indicts Obama and Biden

By Larry Klayman
October 30, 2012 "PR Newswire" -- OCALA, Fla., Oct. 30, 2012 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Larry Klayman, founder and chairman of Freedom Watch, today announced that President Barack Obama and Vice President Joseph Bidenhave been criminally indicted for having willfully released classified national security information concerning the raid onOsama bin Laden's compound, U.S. and Israeli war plans concerning Iran and their cyber-attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. The release of this information, among other harm to U.S. national security, resulted in the killing of members of Seal Team Six by terrorists and the arrest and imprisonment of American covert agents by Pakistan, such as the doctor who aided the CIA with regard to the bin Laden assassination. U.S.-Israeli war plans with Iran have also been compromised.
A true bill of indictment was issued by a Citizens' Grand Jury in Ocala, Florida, who reviewed evidence and voted unanimously to indict Obama and Biden at 6:02 pm on October 29, 2012.
The authority for a Citizens' Grand Jury can be found at
The criminal defendants, Obama and Biden, will now be given notice of their indictment, arraigned and then tried for their alleged crimes.
Mr. Klayman, the Citizens' Prosecutor, issued the following statement: "The Citizens' Grand Jury, after having deliberated, yesterday issued a true bill of indictment. See It did the work that the government should have done, but does not have the integrity to do; that is hold these public officials accountable under the law. For far too long government prosecutors, who are put in place by politicians, have looked the other way as high public officials like Obama and Biden violate the law to further their political agendas. Now, as a result, the people must therefore exercise the rights given to them by the framers of the Constitution, and themselves take legitimate measures to restore the nation to some semblance of legality. This indictment (see of Obama and Biden is just the first step in a legal revolution to reclaim the nation from establishment politicians, government officials and judges who have represented only their own political and other interests at the expense of 'We the People.' Obama and Biden will now be tried in a court of law and I am confident that they will be convicted of these alleged crimes."
For information see Media contact: Adrienne Mazzone, 561-750-9800 x210;
SOURCE Larry Klayman

Citizens Grand Jury video evidence

The Power Of Propaganda, Lies and Distortions.

12-10-31 A web of lies - Obama and the death of US Amassador to Lybia...

A US government, where the practice of lying has gotten out of control...

National Review Online 

OCTOBER 30, 2012 4:00 A.M.

The Wages of Libya 
Careers have ended over less than the administration cover-up.

By Victor Davis Hanson

We have had ambassadors murdered abroad before, but we have never seen anything quite like the tragic fate of Chris Stevens. Amid all the controversy over Libya, we have lost sight of the human — and often horrific — story of Benghazi: a U.S. ambassador attacked, cut off and killed alone, after being abused by frenzied terrorists, and a second member of the embassy staff murdered, as two American private citizens rushed to the rescue, heroically warding off Islamist hit teams, until they were overwhelmed and also killed.

Seven weeks after the tragedy in Benghazi, new government narratives just keep appearing, as various branches of government point the finger at one another. Now the president insists that “the minute” he “found out what was going on” he gave “very clear directives” to “make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to.” The secretary of defense argues that he knew too little to send in military forces to save the post. Meanwhile, we are hearing from other sources that the beleaguered compound in extremis was denied help on three separate occasions, and there are still more contradictory accounts.

When the government systematically misleads and cannot establish a believable narrative, almost everyone involved is eventually tarred. The final chart of those officials in the Nixon White House who were devoured by Watergate was vast — and so it is becoming with the disaster in Libya. If we have learned anything from Watergate and Iran-Contra, it is that the longer officials deceive and obfuscate, the greater the number of wrecked careers and reputations.

Most likely, the political wing of the White House almost immediately made a decision that the attack on our Benghazi consulate should not endanger the conventional narrative of a successful commander-in-chief — ahead in the polls in part because he had highlighted a supposedly successful foreign policy. Key to that story was the notion that the hit on bin Laden and the drone attacks on other Islamists had rendered al-Qaeda all but impotent. In addition, the administration’s supposed lead-from-behind strategy in Libya had served as a model for energizing a democratic Arab Spring. Commander-in-Chief Obama was intent on reminding the country of his competence and toughness as an international leader, and especially of his wise reluctance to rush into areas of instability.

In such a landscape, Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans were brutally murdered. And almost immediately it was clear that the ambassador had earlier warned that Libya was descending into chaos and that Americans were not safe there — only to have his requests for further protection rejected.

During the actual assault on the consulate, a real-time video, streams of e-mail exchanges, and surveys of Islamist websites confirmed that al-Qaedists were carrying out a preplanned assassination — and over the next seven or eight hours it became clear that our staff was in dire need of military assistance that was somehow never sent. Then for nearly two weeks, the president, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, Press Secretary Jay Carney, and U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice advanced a counter-narrative that simply could not have been true: A spontaneous demonstration over a two-month-old video — just happening to coincide with the anniversary of 9/11 — got out of hand as some disruptive protesters showed up with machines gun, mortars, and RPGs and began killing Americans. Since it was an American religious bigot who had prompted such terrible but “natural” riots with his video that ridiculed and injured Islam, we should apologize for the uncouth among us in the strongest terms.

Obama, Clinton, Clapper, Rice, and Carney strove to outdo each other in damning the obscure video maker — to such an extent that he was summarily arrested on a supposedly outstanding probation charge. The message? Ambassadors die and careful U.S. foreign policy is undermined when right-wing bigots abuse their free-speech rights.

Yet almost all of that story is untrue, and it will come back to haunt all those who either by intent or through ignorance engaged in the cover-up. Review the following spinners.

President Obama still does not grasp the significance of Libya. When he calls the attacks there and in Egypt “bumps in the road” or “not optimal,” and asserts that they will not play much of a role in the final weeks of the campaign, he sounds either callous or naïve or both. Collate the administration’s statements over the two weeks following the attacks, and they simply cannot be true. The months-old video proved just too much of a temptation for the president to resonate the themes of his Cairo speech in damning uncouth Americans for offending Muslims. When the president claims that he ordered everything to be done to save the compound, he must be aware that subordinates who did not in turn give orders that relief be sent will eventually come forward to either affirm or deny his statement. His further problem is that lax security, administration misdirection, and hesitancy to aid the beleaguered all feed into the earlier attitudes framed by “overseas contingency operations,” “man-caused disasters,” “workplace violence,” promises to try KSM in a civilian court, the al-Arabiya interview, the Cairo speech, and other efforts to contextualize and airbrush radical Islam’s terrorist assault on the West. In other words, fairly or not, we can discern a logic to why the president would not be candid and accurate about Benghazi.

Secretary Clinton will have to explain why the State Department did not heed requests for greater security, both before and during the attack. And she is beginning to grasp — and so especially is her husband — that the administration is hanging the disaster around her neck. She crudely blamed the attacks on our embassies in the Middle East on the video (with caskets of our dead as backdrop), reminding us that a few months earlier she had crudely giggled about the murder of Qaddafi (“We came, we saw, Qaddafi died”). All in all, her performance during this disaster has been disappointing, and more so with each new disclosure.

Then we come to Ambassador Rice, who apparently was being groomed to succeed Secretary of State Clinton. As part of that trajectory, she was to be point woman for the administration’s spontaneous-mob narrative. That meant that on at least five different occasions Rice hit the Sunday talk shows, apparently to showcase her rhetorical skills, insisting that the attacks in Cairo and Benghazi were ad hoc assaults that had nothing to do with U.S. foreign policy, anti-American animosity, or mistakes in American security preparation. Whether through ignorance or by design, Ambassador Rice repeatedly told an untruth, and did so with energy and dogmatic insistence. Her problem, then, is not just that what she insisted was true was clearly not, but also the unambiguous and forceful manner in which she wove her story. That she suddenly appeared from obscurity to play the sophist, and then retreated back into anonymity, suggests that her diplomatic career will be soon coming to an end.

Next is the matter of Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. His insistence that a mob had caused the mayhem is one untruth or mischaracterization too many — and a wrong assessment that trumps even his earlier absurdities, such as that the Muslim Brotherhood is largely a secular organization or that Qaddafi would not fall from power. Politicians and bureaucrats err all the time; but when intelligence officers do not appear to have intelligence, then they too usually quietly disappear into comfortable retirement.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs General Martin Dempsey at some point supposedly received information about the attack in real time. Why — given the supposed directive of the president to do “whatever we need to” to save our people — he did not order military assistance will have to be explained. Uncertain conditions will not do, because that is what militaries do: go into uncertain conditions to save lives and defeat the enemy. Armchair tacticians will argue that planes and teams could have been sent and then called off near arrival time if that was what circumstances seemed to warrant; that option would have been wiser than sending no one and thereby ensuring that the compound and annex would be overrun. And because General Dempsey has not been shy in weighing in on matters political by warning retired servicemen not to comment on contemporary politics (General Wesley Clark apparently excepted), and because he has phoned a Florida pastor to tell him to tone down his anti-Islamic rhetoric, the public will all the more expect an explanation. If the chairman can lecture both civilians and retired officers on proper behavior, then he should be able as well to explain why he did not heed the president’s order to do “whatever we need to do.”

CIA Director David Petraeus is now by implication being faulted. A brief communiqué that the CIA did not refuse pleas for assistance was prompted by anonymous administration officials’ allegations that it was our intelligence agencies, not the State Department or White House officials, that prevented assistance to our diplomatic mission. At some point Petraeus will probably have to use all his influence and power to correct the administration’s narrative, which is apparently intended to shift culpability to him and his agency. General Petraeus, by his singular record, probably should have been made either chairman of the Joint Chiefs or NATO supreme commander; he apparently received neither offer. After pulling off the surge in Iraq, he was redeployed into Afghanistan under far different — and more difficult — circumstances that limited his range of options, and he had to give up his nominally superior billet as CENTCOM commander. When he took on the CIA job, he apparently was asked to retire from the military. There is a pattern here: selfless service to the United States, but recently in the context of a politicized administration that has used the enormous prestige of Petraeus in ways that have reduced his influence. Directing responsibility away from the administration to the CIA is more of the same, and it puts a historic figure like Petraeus in an unfair predicament.

Benghazi was a disaster, whose graphic details most Americans do not fully know and, in some sense understandably, do not wish to relive. Still, we await two simple clarifications: an administration timeline of exactly who was notified, in what manner, and when on the night of the attack, and a full release of all information detailing the administration reaction to the murders, from the hours in which the attack occurred to the present day.

Without that honesty, those responsible will only continue to weave their tangled Libyan web.

 NRO contributor Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institutionand the author, most recently, of The End of Sparta, a novel about ancient freedom.

12-10-31 FATCA and the Supreme Court of the State of Israel...

The Israeli Supreme Court fails to duly register a petition asking to compel the Banking Regulator to register a complaint against a bank, and the Supreme Court petition is purportedly assigned to an unknown Supreme Court Judge, Liat Ben Melech, with no judicial appointment records to be found... The case shows the State of Israel being administered as a US corporate province. 

Stanley Fischer, Governor of the Bank of Israel - Israel's Banking Regulator and Bilderberg Member, Supreme Court of the State of Israel, FATCA  

Jerusalem, October 30 - In Zernik v Fischer (7650/12), filed in the Supreme Court of Israel on October 23, 2012, Joseph Zernik, PhD, asked the Court to compel Stanley Fischer to register a complaint, which was duly filed with Bank of Israel – Israel's Banking Regulator - against Israel's largest bank, Bank HaPoalim. In a letter forwarded today to the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court, Dr Zernik is asking for certification of the filing of the Petition and its due assignment to a lawfully appointed judge. [1] 

In his letter, Dr Zernik notes that the online public access system of the Supreme Court failed to register the filing of the Petition paper itself under the respective case name and caption. 

In his letter, Dr Zernik also notes that the online public access system failed to register assignment of the case to a judge, and by phone, senior staff in the office of the clerk claimed that the case was assigned to Judge Liat Ben Melech, an unknown person, for whom no Judicial Appointment records are to be found. 

In Zernik v Fischer (7650/12), Dr Zernik of Human Rights Alert (NGO), claims that Stanley Fischer, Governor of the Bank of Israel – Israel's banking regulator – has been patronizing organized white-collar criminality at the top management of Bank HaPoalim, BM, the largest consumer bank in Israel. [2] The Petition asks for a conditional decree, why Fischer would not order the immediate registration of Dr Zernik's August 25, 2012 Complaint against Bank HaPoalim, BM, and its due review. [2]  

On August 25, 2012, the Complaint againt Bank HaPoalim, BM, [3] was first received by Bank of Israel-Banking Regulation, but regardless of repeated requests, Bank of Israel refuses to confirm registration of the complaint and its due review. 

The August 25, 2012 complaint against Bank HaPoalim provided evidence that the Bank issued fabricated legal papers, claiming that it was authorized and required to establish and enforce its own version of United States IRS code on "United States Persons" in the State of Israel. With it, the Bank demands that "United States Persons" sign waiver of privacy for the United States government, relative to their banking transactions. 

The Petition to the High Court of Justice says: 
The Petitioner alleges, that the matter at the foundation of instant Petition is blatantly unlawful conduct of executives at Bank HaPoalim, BM, and/or affiliates against the Petitioner and other "United States Persons" in the State of Israel. Such conduct by Bank HaPoalim, BM, and/or affiliates shows the characteristics of organized white-collar crime. Such conduct commenced prior to the filing of the Petitioner's Complaint, and continues to this date with full knowledge and patronizing by Bank of Israel-Banking Regulation. The ongoing refusal by the Respondent and Bank of Israel-Banking Regulation to register the Petitioner's Complaint against Bank HaPoalim, BM, is integral to this state of affairs. 

The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the 2013 Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in the State of Israel documented numerous falsified electronic records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, including large number of decisions, certified by the late Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen, up to five years after his death. The submission also documents that the Supreme Court's Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz has been occupying her office for the past ten years with no lawful appointment record. [4] 

[1] 12-10-29 Zernik v Fischer (7650-12) – Letter to Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz of the Israeli Supreme Court - Request for certification of entry and due assignment to a judge 
[2] 12-10-23 Joseph Zernik v Stanley Fischer (7650/12) Petition in the High Court of Justice of the State of Israel 
[3] 12-08-25 Dr Zernik's complaint, filed with Israeli banking regulation against Bank HaPoalim - for attempting to extort compliance with US IRS regulations in Jerusalem 
[4] 12-05-10 Human Right Alert, Appendix I to Submission; 15th UPR - State of Israel - "Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel"

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

12-10-30 Hello World!

Tuesday, October 30 @ 20:43 : Corona, California, US
Tuesday, October 30 @ 20:31 : Moscow, RU
Tuesday, October 30 @ 20:26 : Dundee, GB
Tuesday, October 30 @ 20:17 : United States, US
Tuesday, October 30 @ 19:26 : Albany, California, US
Tuesday, October 30 @ 19:09 : Krefeld, DE
Tuesday, October 30 @ 18:55 : Redlands, California, US
Tuesday, October 30 @ 18:26 : Katowice, PL
Tuesday, October 30 @ 18:16 : Maisons-alfort, FR

12-10-30 FATCA - Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (2011) - defining the territory of the legal/banking fraud racket

In FATCA, the US is forcing its own unlawful practices on the banks and banking regulators of other nations.  Given the notorious corruption of US banks and US banking regulation, and the successive collapse of US financial institutions in recent years, responses of various nations to such US extortion define the territory of influence of the US-based legal/banking fraud racket.  In the case of the State of Israel, the case provides a new perspective on US-Israel relationship, one where the State of Israel is administered as a US-corporate province, where the US is key to the corruption of the government of the State of Israel.

FATCA is clearly an act of a rogue nation.
For simplicity sake:
Luigi was born in Milano.  He is a citizen and resident of ITALY.  Luigi was born to parents, who were US citizens, and they obtained for him after birth a US passport. Luigi never set a foot in the US, never worked in the US, never did business in the US. Luigi keeps his savings in the Banco De Milano, in Milano, a financial institution that is chartered by the Republic of Italy, pursuant to Italian law.
Luigi gets a letter from Banco de Milano, unsigned, never naming the sending individual or financial institution, demanding that Luigi waive his privacy to the US government, and also file annually tax returns with the US government, with copies to the Banco de Milano.  Reason - there is pressure by the US government to do so.  No basis in Italian law is ever even mentioned.
Obviously, such conduct amounts to extortion under the color of law.
Therefore, the emerging map of nations, who submit to US extortion under FATCA defines the territory of the legal/banking fraud racket:
  • UK says: Yes, let's put down the matrimony in writing…
See below a link to a US-UK Agreement, proposed UK FATCA implementation legislation, and a business advice page on FATCA compliance..
  • CANADA says: No, thank you!
See below under the Wikipedia entry, controversy.
  • GERMANY says Fine, we will not serve American customers any longer…
Conduct of German banks may amount to discrimination under German law.
See below under the Wikipedia entry, controversy.
  • SWITZERLAND says: No problem, but does it apply to numbered accounts?
  • ISRAEL says – Yes please, do whatever you like, my place is your place…
In the current episode, the State of Israel is about to submit to the racket, with Stanley Fischer, Governor of the Bank of Israel and a Bilderberg member, as the key actor.  The episode sheds new light on the US-Israel relationship, one where Israel is administered as a US corporate province.    Surprisingly, the following lines were permitted to remain on Wikipedia under both the Stanley Fischer and FATCA entries:
Petition against Governor of the Bank of Israel Stanley Fischer, filed in October 2012 with the High Court of Justice, alleged that Fischer's failure to stop Israeli banks from acting on FATCA against Israeli customers, amounted to "replacement of his loyalty to the State of Israel and its laws, with loyalty to another nation and its laws and/or financial institutions and their interests" [19]


[1] 12-09-14 U.S. Treasury Signs Bilateral FATCA Agreement with U.K._Accounting Today

[2] Implementing the UK-US FATCA Agreement (Acrobat PDF, 300KB)
[3] Agreement Between The Government Of The United States Of America And The Government Of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland To Improve International Tax Compliance And To Implement FATCA.
[4] FATCA – Wikipedia
[5] Stanley Fischer - Wikipedia
[6] 12-09-07 The ongoing US-Israeli love affair a) historic perspective
[7] 12-09-07 The ongoing US-Israeli love affair b) Landmark events in unannouncedregime change in Israel 1984-2002
[8] 12-09-10 The ongoing US-Israeli love affair c) Landmark events in unannounced regime change in Israel 2012
[9]   12-10-23 PRESS RELEASE – Petition alleges Bank of Israel Fischer patronizes criminality at Bank HaPoalim, BM

12-10-30 Greece, Italy, Spain...

World Riots 24/h
10 hours ago

According to a report published in news portal, Greek Police officers arrested a 24year old in Corfu island, after posting pictures in his Facebook profile and in a blog. The young islander who participated in yesterday’s ant
ifascist demonstration in Corfu, uploaded a series of photos showing policemen protecting and chatting with members of Golden Dawn ultra nationalist party. Many locals and members of the main Opposition Party SYRIZA-EKM and others of the smaller far-left ANTARSYA party are demonstrating outside the Police Headquarters in the famous Greek island. According to the Greek Police the young man is accused for breaching policemen personal data and for spreading false news which can harm the the country’s prestige.

World Riots 24/h shared a link.
11 hours ago
29/10/2008 Clashes between fascists and antifascists students in Piazza Navona in Rome, Italy, during a demonstration to protest against a law expected to cut spending on education and research. 15 students were arrested by police.
Scontri a piazza Navona-Altre immagini
Altri spezzoni estratti da Anno Zero, Blob e Matrix. Molto significativa, alla fine, la frase tenera e protettiva rivolta da un celerino al "Francesco" di 

World Riots 24/h
11 hours ago
29/10/2008 Clashes between fascists and antifascists students in Piazza Navona in Rome, Italy, during a demonstration to protest against a law expected to cut spending on education and research. 15 students were arrested by police. - BEFORE & AFTER
29/10/2008 Clashes between fascists and antifascists students in Piazza Navona in Rome, Italy, during a demonstration to protest against a law expected to cut spending on education and research. 15 students were arrested by police.

Monday, October 29, 2012

12-10-29 Zernik v Fischer (7650/12) – Request for certification of entry and due assignment to a judge

Given the ambiguity in paper filing procedure and in online public records of the Supreme Court, request was filed with the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court to certify the registration and judicial assignment in this case.

Page #
12-10-29 Zernik v Fischer (7650/12) – Request for certification of entry and due assignment to a judge [English translation - jz]
12-10-29 Zernik v Fischer (7650/12) – Request for certification of entry and due assignment to a judge [Hebrew original]

[1] 12-10-23 PRESS RELEASE – Petition alleges Bank of Israel Fischer patronizes criminality at Bank HaPoalim, BM
[2] 12-10-23 Joseph Zernik v Stanley Fischer (7650/12) Petition in the High Court of Justice of the State of Israel
[3] 12 10 29 FATCA - Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (2011) - Wikipedia and Forbes articles
[4] 12-10-29 Li'at Ben Melech – duly appointed Magistrate of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel?

Chief Clerk – Sarah Lifschitz
Tel: 02-6759603
Fax: 02-6759669
Unrepresented Parties Division – Attorney Ben Tovim
Tel: 02.675.9632
Tel: 02.675.9648
Supreme Court

RE: Dr Joseph Zernik v Governor of the Bank of Isreal Stanley Fischer (Bagatz 7650/12) – request for certification of registration of entry of commencing paper and due assignment to judge.

Your response in this matter within 10 days is respectfully requested.

To the Honorable Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz and Head of Unrepresented Parties Division Attorney Ben Tovim:

In a phone conversation with Attorney Ben Tovim yesterday, we discussed the following –
1.  Registration of entry/rejection from registration of the commencing paper "Petition for a conditional decree" in the above referenced action, which was filed on October 23, 2012 -  in our conversation I raised concerns regarding the registration of the commencing paper in this case.  In contrast with previous cases, Attorney Ben Tovim refused to sign the "Received" stamp in the designated space on the date of filing.  In the online public access system there is no direct notation of the entry into registration of such paper, in contrast with a second paper, filed on the same date, which was listed online under "Requests", as "Waiver of fees", and also in contrast with other Bagatz files, where on the filing of the commencing paper, under "Events", one finds notation "Process filed".  In response, Attorney Ben Tovim was angered that I bother him with such questions.  However, a reasonable person, upon review of the records in this case and similar cases in the online system, surely will find the records inconsistent and ambiguous, and therefore, is likely to be concerned, where no concern should  be found in the first place.
2. Status of the case and due assignment to a judge -  In our phone conversation I mentioned that the processing of this case appears much slower than usual.  Attorney Ben Tovim responded that the case is in the "good hands of Magistrate Liat Ben Melech".  In this case, as in other cases, the online public access system shows no information regarding assignment of cases to the due judicial authority. Moreover, search of the decisions of the Supreme Court finds "Liat Ben Melech" only as an attorney, who appeared on behalf of the government of the State of Israel in a couple of cases in the years 2003-4.  No record was found, referring to "Liat Ben Melech" as "Magistrate".  Similar searches in the Registry of the State of Israel (Judicial Appointments) and on the networks in general, failed as well to discover so far any mention of "Liat Ben Melech" as "Magistrate" of the Supreme Court.
Therefore, I would be grateful if the office of the Clerk of the Court could please produce to my address, below, a certificate pertaining to Dr Joseph Zernik v Governor of the Bank of Israel Stanley Fischer (Bagatz 7650/12) regarding: a. Entry/Rejection from registration of the commencing paper in the action, referenced above, "Petition for a Conditional Decree", which was filed on October 23, 2012, and b. Status of the processing of the case and due assignment to the appropriate judicial authority.
Thank you very much for your help in this matter.
Date: October 29, 2012 
Dr Joseph Zernik
PO Box 31440, Jerusalem 91313

מזכירה ראשית – שרה ליפשיץ
טלפון: 02-6759603
פקס: 02-6759669
ראש מדור בלתי מיוצגים – עו"ד דני בן טובים
בית המשפט העליון
טלפון: 02.675.9632
פקס: 02.675.9648

בנידון: דר' יוסף צרניק נ. נגיד בנק ישראל סטנלי פישר (בג"ץ 7650/12) – בקשה לאישור קבלה לרישום והפנייה לגורם השיפוטי המתאים
תשובתכם בנידון מתבקשת בכבוד תוך 10 ימים.
לכבוד מזכירה ראשית שרה ליפשיץ וראש מדור בלתי מיוצגים עו"ד בן טובים:
בשיחת הטלפון אתמול עם עו"ד בן טובים, דנו דלהלן:
1.      קבלה/דחייה  מרישום של כתב הפתיחה של הבג"ץ הנ"ל, "עתירה למתן צו על תנאי", שהוגש לרישום ביום ה-23 לאוקטובר, 2012 - בשיחתנו העליתי חשש בדבר קבלתו לרישום של  הכתב הפתיחה במקרה זה. בניגוד למספר מקרים קודמים, סירב עו"ד בן טובים לחתום על החותמת "נתקבל" במקום המיועד על ההעתק שבידי ביום הגשת הבג"ץ.  במערכת המקוונת לניהול גישת הציבור אין כל ציון ישיר של קבלה לרישום וברור של כתב כזה, בניגוד, לדוגמה, לרישום כתב שהוגש באותו יום, באותו התיק, ונרשם תחת "בקשות" כ-"פטור מאגרה", ובניגוד לתיקי הבג"ץ אחרים, בהם נרשם ביום הגשת כתב הפתיחה תחת "אירועים" - "הוגש הליך".  בתגובה התרעם עו"ד בן טובים שאני מטריד אותו בשאלות מאין אלה.  אולם אדם בר דעת, שיבדוק את הכתבים במקרה זה וכתבים דומים במערכת המקוונת לניהול גישת הציבור, לבטח ימצא את הרישומים בלתי עקביים ובלתי ברורים, ולפי כך קרוב לוודאי שיחשוש, במקום בו מן הראוי שלא יהיה כל חשש כלל.
2.      מצב הטיפול בבג"ץ הנ"ל והפנייתו לגורם השיפוטי המתאים – בשיחתנו הערתי שהטיפול בבג"ץ זה ניראה איטי בהרבה מן הרגיל.  על כך השיב עו"ד בן טובים  שהתיק נמצא "בידיה הטובות של הרשמת ליאת בן מלך". בתיק זה, כבשאר התיקים, אין במערכת המקוונת לניהול גישת הציבור כל רישום של הפניית התיק לגורם השיפוטי המתאים.  יתרה מזאת, בחיפוש בהחלטות בית המשפט נמצאה "ליאת בן מלך" כעו"ד שהופיעה לפני בית המשפט בשם ממשלת ישראל בשני תיקים בשנים 2003-4, אך לא נמצא כל מסמך המתייחס ל"ליאת בן מלך" כ"רשמת".  חיפושים דומים ברשומות (ילקוט הפרסומים – מינוי שופטים) וברשת המקוונת בכללה, לא העלו עד עתה כל אזכור של "ליאת בן מלך" כ"רשמת" בבית המשפט העליון גם הם.
לפיכך אודה אם מזכירות בית המשפט תואיל להמציא לכתובתי, להלן, אישור בר תוקף לגבי תיק דר' יוסף צרניק נ. נגיד בנק ישראל סטנלי פישר (בג"ץ 7650/12): א. קבלה/דחייה  מרישום של כתב הפתיחה של הבג"ץ הנ"ל, "עתירה למתן צו על תנאי", שהוגש לרישום ביום ה-23 לאוקטובר, 2012, ו-ב.  מצב הטיפול בבג"ץ הנ"ל והפנייתו לגורם השיפוטי המתאים.
רוב תודות על עזרתכם בנידון.
תאריך: 29 לאוקטובר, 2012,
ד"ר יוסף צרניק
ת"ד 31440, ירושלים 91313