Saturday, March 10, 2012

12-03-10 Log Cabin Republicans - protecting civil rights through bankers' Fraud on the Court // 在美国法院的欺诈和腐败 // // Мошенничество и коррупция в судах США // Fraude y corrupción en los tribunales de EE.UU.

The docket of the case made it evident all along that the case in the US District Court, Central District of California under Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS and Clerk TERRY NAFISI, amounted to Fraud on the Court.  Now, Freedom of Information response by the US Department of Justice provides the definitive evidence - a simulated summons and a simulated judgment.  Such Fraud on the US Courts from coast to coast has been typically reserved for cases, where the civil rights of individuals are abused to benefit banks, large corporations, and corrupt government officials. Apparently, Log Cabin Republicans got wealthy and influential enough to purchase Fraud on the Court through the services of a large banking law firm - Case & White, LLP.  The case of Log Cabin Republicans is the first to document Fraud on the Court for the protection of civil rights... 

[]  [] [] Larger view [] [] [] [] [] []US District Court, Central District of California: Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS, Clerk of the Court TERRY NAFISI;
9th Circuit Court of Appeals: 
Judges WILLIAM CANBY, Jr, EDWARD LEAVY, ARTHUR L ALARCON, DIARMUID F O'SCANNLAIN, BARRY G SILVERMAN, Clerk of the Court MOLLY C DWYER 
"Apparently, Log Cabin Republicans got wealthy and influential enough to purchase Fraud on the Court through the services of a large banking law firm - Case & White, LLP.," says Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), "Now we have the definitive proof, thanks to the Freedom of Information response by the US Department of Justice."   Today, Human Rights Alert published the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) response by the US Department of Justice. [1] 

The FOIA response was substandard, yet it provided the definitive evidence of the conduct of simulated litigation in the US District Court, Southern District of California:  [2]

  • A simulated summons record, missing the seal of the court, required by US law. [3]
  • A simulated, invalid authentication record (NEF) for the October 2010 Judgment by Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS, missing the Electronic Document Stamp, required by the General Order 08-02 of the US District Court, Central District of California. [4]
The FOIA response was also notable in the record that it failed to provide:
  • Assignment Order for Judge GEORGE CHIAVELLI
  • Assignment Order for Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS
  • Authentication records (NEFs) for various Minutes and Orders by either Judges.
Clerk of the District Court TERRY NAFISI had previously denied access to these records, in patent disregard of First Amendment and Common Law rights to access court records.

Human Rights Alert has previously published extensive documentation of the Fraud on the Court in the litigation of the case, based on the docket records themselves: [5]
  • US Judges GEORGE SCHIAVELLI and VIRGINIA PHILLIPS appeared as Presiding Judges in the case, both with no Assignment Orders. Absent Assignment Order in a specific case, a US judge has no authority to adjudicate in the matter.
  • In 2004 Judge SCHIAVELLI issued a judgment in the case, in favor of the United States. The judgment was listed in the PACER docket as “entered”, and was listed in the Judgment Index of the Court.
  • Consequently, the case was deemed “closed” by court staff. However, access to the certification of the2004 judgment is denied.
  • The 2004 Judge SCHIAVELLI “Judgment” was never overturned through an appeal, or any other judicial proceeding.
  • In 2010 Judge PHILLIPS appeared in the case and issued the opposing judgment, in favor of the Log Cabin Republicans. The 2010 judgment was again listed in the docket as “entered”, but was not listed in the Judgment Index of the Court. Access to the certification of the 2004 judgment is denied as well.
The US Court of Appeals holds jurisdiction to conduct appeals only from valid and effectual, certified judgments, not from void ones, and the records in the appeal could not possibly be deemed valid legal records of the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, either:
  • A docket was opened for the appeal by the US Court of Appeals Clerk MOLLY C DWYER from an uncertified judgment. The Clerk of the US Court of Appeals should have refused to open a docket from an uncertified judgment of the US District Court.
  • The purported orders by the Circuit Judges in the Appeal are all unsigned records.
  • The Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit denied a request for certification of the docket of the Appeal.
While the appeal was purportedly before the 9th Circuit Court, Dr Zernik filed a motion to intervene, providing detailed evidence of the Fraud on the Court in the litigation of the case.  Regardless, the US Court of Appeals continued the litigation of the simulated appeal from the simulated District Court judgment, which was concluded in a published simulated opinion. [6]
"Apparently, Log Cabin Republicans got wealthy and influential enough to purchase Fraud on the Court through the services of a large banking law firm - Case & White, LLP," says Dr Zernik

Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS is one of a series of California and US judges, who refused to answer on requests to disclose financial benefits to them, if any, by BANK OF AMERICA, while continuing to engage in Fraud on the Court in cases involving BANK OF AMERICA. [7]
Fraud on the Courts is typically reserved for cases, where the civil rights of individuals are abused to benefit banks, large corporations, and corrupt government officials.  The case of Log Cabin Republicans is the first to document the same for the protection of civil rights.

Dr Zernik has previously published and presented evidence of the large-scale fraud in the US courts' records in an international computer science conference and in the 2010 World Criminology Congress. [8,9]  Dr Zernik has also created an online archive of such fraudulent US court records from coast to coast. [10]  Additional evidence was independently discovered by PROPUBLICA and published both by PROPUBLICA and the NATIONAL LAW JOURNAL. [11]
More recently, OCCUPY THE COURTS has focused on the role of the US courts in corruption of the US government and banking system under the current crisis. [12]
"I doubt that even the Occupiers realize how central the courts are to the current crisis," adds Dr Zernik,"The evidence suggests widespread bribing of state and US judges by the banks." 

Similar conditions prevailed in the US courts a century ago, during the notorious Robber Baron Era, which led to the Great Depression.  At that time, the US courts were described by the US Congress as "a burlesque".  Consequently, laws were enacted by Congress to reform of the US courts.  Both then and now, corruption of the offices of the Clerks of the Courts, who hold the duty to safeguard the integrity of the US courts' records, was central to the corruption. [13]
"The US has developed a simulated justice system," concludes Dr Zernik, "It is unlikely that the US would emerge from the current financial and constitutional crisis, unless corruption of the US courts is addressed." 
###
Joseph Zernik, PhD [14]____
LINKS:
[1] 11-02-12 RE - Reply in Re - FOIA Response on Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (2:04-cv-08425) in the US District Court, Central District of California s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/84804264/
[2] "Simulated litigation", "simulated decisions", "simulated service" here refer to conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS. 
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
        (1)  induce payment of a claim from another person;  or                      
        (2)  cause another to:                                                       
            (A)  submit to the putative authority of the document;  or                
            (B)  take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b)  Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
The practice is widespread in both the state and US courts at all levels.
[3]  US law, 28 USC 1691 requires:  
All writs and process issuing from a court of the United States shall be under the seal of the court and signed by the 
clerk thereof.  
[4] 08-02-00 US District Court Central District of California: General Order 08-02, Authorizing CM/ECF, Digital Authentication and Attestation in NEFs
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27632471/Note: The US District Court, Central District of California itself conceded that judicial records, issued with invalid authentication records (NEFs - Notice of Elecronic Filing) are invalid court records, which should be removed from the dockets:
12-03-08 The US Courts Engage in Large-Scale Fraud on the People
http://www.scribd.com/doc/84535064/[5] 11-02-09 Press Release: ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’  the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Insists on Conducting a Simulated Appeal from a Simulated Judgment of the US District Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49070315/
[6] 11-09-29 Published Opinion in Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al in the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit  the outcome of simulated litigation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/84773296/
[7] 11-04-12 PRESS RELEASE: Bribing of State and US Judges by Bank of America Must be a Serious Concern!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52846502/
[8] 11-08-01 Zernik, J: Fraud and corruption in the US courts is tightly linked to failing banking regulation and the financial crisis, 16th World Criminology Congress presentation 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/61351562/[9] 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/[10] 11-04-23 Habeas Corpus in the United States - the case of Richard Isaac Fine
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24729084/
11-06-22 PRESS RELEASE Judge Guilford Refuses to Opines on Fraud in the Electronic Record Systems of the US Courts s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/58486479/10-02-24 Huminski v Town of Bennington Vermont (03-7036) - Alleged Fraud by Justice Sotomayor s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27386331/10-05-15 Huminski v Rutland Pollice Department et al (1:99-cv-160) Alleged Honest Services Fraud at the US District Court - Vermont
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31407137/10-02-12 Huminski v Rutland Police Department et al (1:99-cv-160)at the US District Court, Vermont: False Memo and Order- served with no NEF at all-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31305312/11-06-30 RE: McGarry v Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc et al (1:10-cv-11343) - Racketeering through Simulated Litigation in the US District Court, Massachusetts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/59124169/[11] 11-04-25 Linzer D, In Gitmo Opinion, Two Versions of Reality - Pro Publica, April 25, 2011
http://www.scribd.com/doc/59213685/10-10-11 Linzer, D. “In GITMO Opinion, Two Versions of Reality,” The National Law Journal, October 11, 2010
http://www.scribd.com/doc/53954229/[12] 12-01-07 Occupy the Courts – January 20, 2012
http://www.scribd.com/doc/77457299/[13] 02-00-00 Messinger, I Scott: Order in The Court - History of Clerks of United States Courts, Federal Judicial Center (2002)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34819774/[14] 11-07-04 Joseph Zernik,PhD, Biographical Sketch
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/
_________________ 

Boycott the US presidential vote! It only legitimizes the illegitimate... 11-12-10 Where Should #Occupy Go Next? Civil Disobedience in the Footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/ 
Secede! The US in its current form is simply unmanageable...12-01-01 Secession - A Smart Business Move!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/76877453/_______
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”  The 2010 UN UPR report called upon the United States to stop executions, restore habeas corpus and close GITMO, abolish slavery, criminalize torture...
_______  
Flag Counter: 133http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ 
Total Reads: 762,060Followers: 1,360http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp://www.scribd.com/SeyagLizhuyotHaadam Total Reads: 22,066http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 
Total Item Views: 664,803
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner_____________________________
Take away justice, then, and what are governments but great bandit bands?Saint Augustine, Civitas Dei (City of God,4.4)
_____________________________WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
*  
"I think it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history," said Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School who has written articles analyzing the role of courts in the financial crisis. "I can't think of one where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Reuters (Jan 22, 2012)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/79572282/
Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continueCNN (April 7, 2011)
About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006… That number could balloon to about 6 million by 2013 Bloomberg (January 2011)
"...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences." http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
"...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
"This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."     Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/"Innocent people remain in prison""...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306 /_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
"...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
"On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE CONDITIONS IN THE PRISON IN MONROE COUNTY, TENESSEE?
"What goes on there is more like gulags of centuries ago."ACLUhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/72546279/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?
"More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011) http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/_____________________________
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
"The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/
____________________________

12-03-10 Welcome France!

Last New Visitor

France 
Visited March 10, 2012

12-03-07 FBI director: Have to check whether targeted killing rule is outside US only // El director del FBI: Hay que comprobar si la regla asesinato selectivo es sólo para fuera de EE.UU. // 联邦调查局局长:有,以是否定点清除规则,是美国以外唯一

Just a reminder: Pursuant to the law enacted in the wake of Edgar J Hoover's tenure as FBI Director, Robert Mueller III, was supposed to be out of office a couple of years ago...
JZ
________
Emacs!
House of Representatives - POLITICS

FBI director: Have to check whether targeted killing rule is outside US only

By Catherine Herridge

[]

Published March 07, 2012

FBI Director Robert Mueller on Wednesday said he would have to go back and check with the Department of Justicewhether Attorney General Eric Holder's "three criteria" for the targeted killing of Americans also applied to Americans inside the U.S.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03/07/mueller-have-to-check-with-holder-whether-targeted-killing-rule-is-outside-us/#ixzz1ogimSYiJ