Monday, November 28, 2016

2016-11-27 RAFI ROTEM affair: Criminal complaint filed against Judge Beeri. Will he continue cheating on the Sentencing tomorrow?

Rafi Rotem affair: Criminal Complaint filed against Judge Daniel Beeri - will he continue the fraud in the "Sentencing" hearing tomorrow?
Criminal Complaint was filed today with Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit against Judge Daniel Beeri. The Complaint pertains to Fraud Upon the Court in "Verdict" hearing in the criminal prosecution of Rafi Rotem - Tax Authority whistle-blower.  For tomorrow, "Sentencing" hearing was scheduled, and it is easy to guess that tomorrow too, Judge Daniel Beeri will conduct an "informal, off the record" hearing...  Since what "senior legal scholars" wish to see as "total jungle in the courts", alternatively - "decline in formalism, increase in values", is in fact widespread judicial incompetence and/or corruption. Therefore, a sham, fraudulent "Verdict" hearing would be followed almost by necessity by a sham, fraudulent "Sentencing" hearing...
The systematic perversion of records and process by Israeli judges has become an epidemic with the implementation of Net-HaMishpat case management system...  And Judge Daniel Beeri's conduct is only the latest episode in abuse of Rafi Rotem by the courts and law enforcement over the past 15 years.
Obviously, Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit plays a key role in such corruption of the courts - since he prevents any enforcement of the law on criminal judges.

ReAD more: http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2016/11/2016-11-27-rafi-rotem-affair-criminal.html


   
Figures 1: Fraud in State of Israel v Rafi Rotem started under the stewardship of Judge Yael Pradelsky, and comes to an end now under Judge Daniel Beeri.  Moshe Silman, z"l, Roman Zadorov, Rafi Rotem - victims of criminality by judges.
____
Occupy TLV, November 27 - Criminal Complaint has been filed today with the Attorney General against Judge Daniel Beeri - pertaining to Fraud Upon the Court, perversion of court records and court process in the criminal prosecution of Rafi Rotem - Tax Authority whistle-blower. [1]

A. Judge Daniel Beeri "fabricated" the October 06, 2016 "Verdict" hearing
The complaint originates in the "fabrication" of the October 06, 2016 "Verdict" hearing.
To this date no protocol has been entered for the "Verdict" hearing.  Therefore, it should be deemed an "informal, off-the-record" hearing, or in common parlance - "fabricated" court hearing (Figure 2).
Figures 2: State of Israel v Rafi Rotem (1074-02-13) in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court. For all other hearings that took place, the entry of a "protocol" is listed - except for the October 06, 2016 "Verdict" hearing. Therefore, the "Verdict" hearing should be deemed an "informal, off-the-record" hearing, or in common parlance "fabricated" hearing.
____

B. Judge Daniel Beeri's fraudulent intent is clarified by his refusal to correct the purported "errors" in failing to enter a "Verdict" hearing protocol.  In response to a series of requests and notices, Judge Daniel Beeri acts like a common fraudster.
Over the past month a series of six (6) requests have been filed with Judge Daniel Beeri, pertaining to the missing October 06, 2016 "Verdict" hearing protocol.  The requests sought to materialize the right to inspect "a lawfully made and lawfully entered October 06, 2016 "Verdict" hearing protocol".  
In response, Judge Daniel Beeri issued a series of five (5) "Post-it Decisions". None of them directly address the request to inspect - neither in a positive, nor in a negative manner.  Instead, Judge Beeri issued false and misleading, invalid, unsigned, unenterd "Post-it Decision", none of which was duly served on the Requester...
Judge Beeri's conduct demonstrates his refusal to correct the purported "error" in failing to enter an October 06, 2016 hearing protocol.  Instead, Judge Beeri has issued evasive "Post-it Decisions", like a common fraudster... (Figure 3).  Therefore, Judge Daniel Beeri's conduct relative to the requests to inspect provides excellent evidence of the intent to defraud in failing to enter an October 06, 2016 "Verdict"  hearing protocol.

 

 
Figures 3: State of Israel v Rafi Rotem (1074-02-13) in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court. A series of five (5) "Post-it Decisions" by Judge Daniel Beeri on requests to inspect "a lawfully made and lawfully entered October 06, 2016 "Verdict" hearing protool".  The issuing of this series of false and misleading, invalid "Post-it Decisions" should be deemed evidence of the fraudulent intents of Judge Daniel Beeri.
____

Following is the conclusion of the Criminal Complaint, filed today

    G. Summary
    28. Conduct of Judge Daniel Beeri in State of Israel v Rafi Rotem (1074-02-13) should be deemed:
    (a) Fraud, perversion of court records and court process – through the conduct of a an “off the record” October 06, 2016 hearing, instead of a formal, on the record “Reading of Verdict” hearing, as scheduled in the Court Calendar, and refusal to correct this perversion regardless of repeat notices.
    (b) Fraud, perversion of court records and court process – through his conduct pertaining to the requests to inspect, through the issuance of “Post-it Decisions”, which fail to address the requests, avoid decision on the matter, are invalid and misleading.
    29. Conduct of Judge Daniel Beeri in State of Israel v Rafi Rotem (1074-02-13) should also be deemed serious violation of:
    (a) The right for Due Process – pursuant to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966);
    (b) The right for Fair Public Hearing – pursuant to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948).
    30. Conduct of Judge Daniel Beeri should be deemed part of the retaliation, intimidation, harassment campaign against a whistle-blower of serious government corruption. The Rafi Rotem affair again demonstrates the widespread incompetence and/or corruption of Israeli judges, and the central role of the courts and the law enforcement system in government corruption in the State of Israel today.
    31. Refusal by the Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit to instruct the investigation of instant Complaint would again show his central role in preventing the eradication of corruption of the courts and the law enforcement system.
C. Conduct of Judge Daniel Beeri is the latest episode in fraud upon the court, which started under the stewardship of Judge Yael Pardelsky.
The latest fraud by Judge Daniel Beeri in this court file is direct extension of the fraud and perversion of the criminal prosecution, which started under the stewardship of Judge Yael Pradelsky.
Already in August 2014 Notice was sent to Supreme Court Presiding Justice Asher Grunis, detailing the scope of fraud in this court file.  Justice Asher Grunis refused of initiate any corrective actions.
Judge Pradelsky, on the other hand, secretly entered the Notice record into the criminal court file, in violation of the law.  Moreover, Judge Yael Pradelsky and Presiding Judge Ziva Hadassi-Herman of the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court secretly issued "Post-it Decisions" on the "Notice" record... (Figures 4).

     

Figures 3: State of Israel v Rafi Rotem (1074-02-13) in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court. Secretive "Post-it Decisions" by Judge Yael Pradelskyi and Presiding Judge Ziva Hadassi-Herman on a 'Notice" sent to Supreme Court Presiding Justice Asher Grurnis, detailing fraud upon the court and perversions of process in this court file.The secretive entry of such records in a criminal court file should be deemed a seriious violation of Due Process in itself.
____

The  2014 Notice to Presiding Justice Asher Grunis and the secretive "Post-it Decisions" on it, were filed as Exhibits in today's Criminal Complaint.

D. It remains to be seen how Judge Daniel Beeri will "fabricate" tomorrow's "Sentencing" hearing
For tomorrow, a "Sentencing" hearing is scheduled. However, it is easy to guess that tomorrow Judge Daniel Beeri will conduct yet another "informal, off-the-records" hearing, i.e., Judge Daniel Beeri is fully expected to continue the fraud tomoorow.
The reason is clear: What "senior legal scholars" like to perceive as "a total jungle in the courts", or alternatively, "decline in formalism and increase in values", is in fact widespread judicial incompetence and/or corruption.
The perversions are entirely systematic, and it is difficult to describe them as incidental.  Therefore, it is almost a must that "Sentencing", originating in a sham/simulated "Verdict" must be sham/simulated "Sentencing" as well.
The the systematic perversion of records and process by corrupt judges has become an epidemic with the implementation of Net-HaMishpat.
E. Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit will most likely refuse to enforce the law on Judge Daniel Beeri. Therefore, the Attorney General plays a key role in abuse of the public by corrupt judges.
Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit will most likely refuse to instruct a true investigation of Judge Daniel Beeri's conduct.
The Attorney General consistently refuses to instruct true investigation of judges, who engage in fraud on the bench.
Therefore, Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit should be deemed central to corruption of the courts.
LINKS:
[1] 2016-11-27 Criminal Complaint against Judge Daniel Beeri, pertaining to his conduct in criminal prosecution of whistle blower Rafi Rotem //
תלונה פלילית נגד השופט דניאל בארי לגבי התנהלותו בהליכים הפליליים נגד חושף השחיתויות רפי רותם

No comments: